Tool · October 2026
How often do AI models pick Celery?
In October 2026, Celery was named in 19 of 900 picks, by 8 models, in 1 category. Most of them were in Background jobs: 19 of 63 picks (30%). That is 2.1% of all 900 picks; Laguna S 2.1 named it most often (7 times).
n = 19 picksMeasured 2026-10-19Method
Model pick, not a product recommendation. The models answered without a repository, existing code or tools, so the index shows what a model names when nothing in the project constrains it. It says nothing about quality, security, price or market share.
By category
| Category | Picks | of | Share | Bar | Most named in category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background jobs | 19 | 63 | 30% | BullMQ |
By context
| Context | Picks |
|---|---|
| Next.js (TypeScript) | 0 |
| Python FastAPI | 15 |
| Vibe coder (non-technical) | 4 |
| EU users (GDPR) | 0 |
By model
| Model | Picks |
|---|---|
| Laguna S 2.1 | 7 |
| Nemotron 3 Super 120B | 6 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 1 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | 1 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | 1 |
| GPT-5.6 | 1 |
| Kimi K3 | 1 |
Alternatives named in the same runs
When a model picked Celery, these are the other tools it listed, by number of runs.
- RQ: 17 runs
- Dramatiq: 13 runs
- Huey: 8 runs
- arq: 6 runs
- Sidekiq: 3 runs
- BullMQ: 3 runs
- APScheduler: 2 runs
- FastAPI BackgroundTasks: 2 runs
Vendor facts
We have not verified facts about Celery yet. Use the vendor's own documentation.